Medicinal gases cause blindness in patients with the first-instance judgment not released gas composition

in June 2015, Beijing, nantong more patients in the use of & other; Perfluorinated propane & throughout; Gas for eye treatment, eyesight decline, blindness gradually. After the incident was reported by the media last year, causing concern.

use & other; Perfluorinated propane & throughout; Gas treatment to patients with blindness; Haidian court of first instance verdict factory, hospital, founding, jing Ming company with the research and judgment appeal

data diagram (for figure/visual China)

s & other; Blinding gas: poison come from? Throughout the &; Track

Beijing news dispatch (reporter once autumn) in June 2015, Beijing, nantong more patients in the use of & other; Perfluorinated propane & throughout; Gas for eye treatment, eyesight decline, blindness gradually. After the incident was reported by the media last year, causing concern.

yesterday, nantong patients mahakasyapa told the Beijing news reporter, he applied for the tianjin binhai new area and open the penalty decision of jing Ming company, has been allowed to. After obtaining the relevant evidence materials in, he will continue to prosecute affiliated hospital of nantong university and tianjin jing Ming company.

to Beijing with the attorney wen-fang liu also said that the haidian district court has sentenced to jing Ming gives patients compensate, but as a result of not released blinding gas composition. For some patients to appeal. In addition, the founding, tianjin jing Ming the research company are dissatisfied with the outcome, has appealed. For the second time case has not yet been set.

injection & other; Perfluorinated propane & throughout; After blindness

6 to 7, 2015, jiangsu nantong university affiliated hospital, Peking University third hospital was caught out dozens of patients with blinding eye ophthalmic perfluorinated propane gas. National food administration of drug safety, the survey found a total of 71 patients is adverse reactions.

state food drug safety administration issued a “about eye ophthalmic perfluorinated propane gas suspicious group investigating the situation of adverse events report shows that through the epidemiological investigation shows, produced by this group of patients with acute inflammation and batch number of 15040001 using relevance of perfluorinated propane gas. This batch of drug is produced by tianjin jing Ming new technology development co., LTD.

in April 2016, the Beijing news and various media reported that patients with nantong, Beijing and other places in use & other; Perfluorinated propane & throughout; Blinding event after treatment of eye diseases. Perfluorinated propane is inert gas, when intraocular surgery, eye ophthalmic perfluorinated propane is used in the vitreous – intraocular gas filling material for retinal detachment surgery. Many patients, said in the injected & other; Perfluorinated propane & throughout; Gas, their vision loss and blindness symptoms.

not released blinding gas composition of trial

in May last year, 16 patients in Beijing for founding the research filed a lawsuit. In addition to demand compensation from the hospital, patients also requires public hospital lead to eye damage in patients with gas composition.

in the trial, the court added tianjin jing Ming company as the defendant. Court, founding agent offered to the research and advances, medical expenses, but said the hospital there is no fault. The patient has request, undertake the responsibility of the medical behavior identification, first to discuss compensation.

on December 28th, patients with the attorney wen-fang liu, said on October 31 this year, the haidian district court of first instance verdict, sentenced to jing Ming company give patients with medical treatment, lost wages, fees, transportation fees, such as compensation, by founding the research for such payment shall be jointly and severally liable for compensation.

in the process of identification, doctor-patient both sides require authentication institutions of gas composition were identified. However, the first-instance judgment does not show blind gas composition.

court, according to the analysis of the composition of gas poisoning belong to the scope of national adverse drug reaction monitoring, should is the responsibility of the competent department of state, is not the category of judicial authentication, at present the department in charge of the absence of definite composition of gas poisoning, the court makes material to meet the needs of the appraisal.

due to unpublished blinding gas composition, patients have appeal. In addition, the defendant founding research, tianjin jing Ming company are dissatisfied with the outcome, has appealed.

at present, the second time has not yet been determined.

patients requires the government information publicity

in July 2016, nantong 21 patients with victims sued affiliated hospital of nantong university and tianjin jing Ming new technology development co., LTD., in addition to demand compensation, also requires hospitals and manufacturers released blinding poisonous and harmful ingredients of medicinal gases.

on December 2, 2016, nantong chongchuan district people’s court in the case of civil verdict shows that because of this case belongs to the national major impact cases, civil series of cases in Beijing and tianjin administrative cases have relevance to the case processing results, and the case has yet to end, so this case to suspend the trial.

nantong patients mahakasyapa told the Beijing news reporter, trial suspended after he twice prosecution of tianjin binhai new area and market supervision and administration. Reason is that the binhai new area market supervision bureau in 2015 has made to the jing Ming company administrative punishment, confiscate the perfluorinated propane gas 7557 boxes, and impose a fine ranging from about 5.19 million yuan. Mahakasyapa hope to binhai new area market supervision and administration, fulfill their duties of the government information disclosure and open the penalty decision and relevant evidence materials.

mahakasyapa, said this case to tianjin binhai new area such as marketing and administration of quality supervision, information, after a public execution can be heard by a civil court to recover.

this year on September 20, the tianjin binhai new area administrative ruling, the people’s court shall be ordered to the binhai new area market regulatory authority within 15 days of the plaintiff mahakasyapa apply for government information openness to reply. Trial, append the tianjin binhai new area court crystal bright company to a third person, but tianjin jing Ming company refuses to accept the verdict, and immediately to tianjin the second intermediate people’s court of appeal.

on December 12, 2017, tianjin the second intermediate people’s court to make a final judgment, dismissal of involved enterprise appeal is upheld. It is understood that related government information disclosure content at the latest will be announced on January 3, 2018.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *